"In the U.S. Supreme Court case Dowling vs United States, the Supreme
Court explicitly valued whether copies could be regarded as stolen goods
under the law, and held that they could not.
"Instead, “interference with copyright does not easily equate with
theft, conversion, or fraud. The Copyright Act even employs a separate
term of art to define one who misappropriates a copyright: ‘[...] an
infringer of the copyright.’”
No comments:
Post a Comment